Top 8 trong Top 15 những câu hỏi Ielts Writing khó nhất và câu trả lời mẫu band 7.5+ không thể bỏ qua.
Some people think the government should invest more in public services instead of wasting money on the arts (such as music and theatre).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In times of limited budgets, some people argue that government funding should prioritize essential public services over the arts. While I agree that sectors like healthcare and education are fundamental, I believe that the arts also deserve government investment due to their cultural, emotional, and economic value.
Public services like hospitals, schools, and infrastructure are undeniably vital. Investing in them ensures a healthy, educated population and supports economic growth. Especially in developing countries, basic needs must be met before luxury spending is justified. Critics of arts funding argue that art is a private interest and should be financed by individuals or private sponsors.
However, the arts are not merely entertainment—they reflect national identity, preserve history, and foster creativity. Publicly funded art programs, museums, and performances allow all citizens—not just the wealthy—to access cultural experiences. Additionally, the creative industry generates employment and contributes significantly to tourism. For example, cities like Paris and London are cultural hubs partly because of their vibrant artistic scenes.
In my opinion, a balanced approach is necessary. Governments should ensure core services are well-funded, but not at the expense of the arts. A society that ignores culture risks becoming economically efficient but emotionally impoverished.