Top 6 trong Top 15 những câu hỏi Ielts Writing khó nhất và câu trả lời mẫu band 7.5+ không thể bỏ qua.
Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community. Others think they should be paid for their work.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is an ongoing debate about whether young people should engage in community service without pay. Some believe unpaid volunteering cultivates responsibility and empathy, while others argue that all work deserves compensation. This essay will examine both views and present a reasoned opinion.
Advocates of unpaid service argue that it helps young people develop social values and civic engagement. When teenagers volunteer at local shelters, hospitals, or environmental clean-up programs, they not only contribute to society but also gain practical skills and a sense of fulfillment. Moreover, requiring such service encourages youth to look beyond personal gain and think about the well-being of others. Many educational institutions now incorporate volunteering as part of their curriculum to foster holistic development.
On the other hand, critics believe that even community work should be fairly compensated. Young people, especially from low-income families, may not afford to work without pay, which could increase inequality. Furthermore, paid positions may motivate youth to take their responsibilities more seriously, improving the overall quality of the work. Payment also acknowledges the value of their time and effort, promoting the principle that all labor, regardless of purpose, deserves recognition.
In my view, while encouraging volunteerism is important, it should not be mandatory or entirely unpaid. A hybrid model—offering financial support or academic credit—could make participation more inclusive and rewarding. This approach balances the social benefits of volunteering with fairness and equity.